Legal Opinion
Strimling v. Union Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 5, 1927No. 26,051PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from an order sustaining a general demurrer to his complaint in an action to recover on a bond against mechanics’ liens, the argument successful below being that the action was prematurely brought.
The complaint makes the facts appear about as follows: The bond was furnished by defendant as surety and one McDonald as principal to Michael Connor (to Avhose rights plaintiff has succeeded) as the mortgagee in a $15,000 second mortgage' on a Lyndale avenue property in Minneapolis then OAvned by McDonald. It recites the erection of a store building thereon by McDonald, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mechanics' Savings Bank v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Wood v. Pacific Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leshefsky v. American EmPloyers' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Business Women's Holding Co. v. Farmers & Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Strimling v. Union Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Danielski v. Pioneer Building Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932