Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Rauland-Borg Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 11, 1997No. 96 C 4959PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Clare M. Johnson’s motion to compel discovery and to bar testimony. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Clare Johnson was employed at Defendant Rauland-Borg Corporation for approximately fifteen years. She began her employment as a secretary and was eventually promoted to an executive secretary.
In the spring of 1989, Johnson reported directly to Carl Cox — Rauland-Borg’s vice president of engineering. Beginning in 1991, Johnson alleges that Cox began to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Valerie A. Baskerville v. Culligan International CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Susan McKENZIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Helen Brooms, Cross-Appellee v. Regal Tube Company, Copperweld Corporation and Charles Gustafson, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Richard L. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harter v. University of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
- Brownell v. Roadway Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Wilstein v. San Tropai Condominium Master Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Walker v. County of Contra CostaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. E'Lite Optik, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.