Legal Opinion

Hendricks v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 17, 1987No. 9-84LPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This case came before the court on plaintiffs’ claim of taking without just compensation of the economic remainder of land encumbered with flowage easements purchased by the United States, acting through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The flowage easements permitted the Corps to occasionally flood plaintiffs’ land without incurring liability. Plaintiff, Randall Hendricks, a practicing attorney appearing pro se, and his wife purchased two tracts of land predominantly encumbered with flowage easements with the intent to use the land as a cattle stock…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Yuba Goldfields, Inc. And Placer Service Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Tarrant Regional Water District v. GraggTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Cloutier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  3. Bennett v. Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement District No. OneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. Youngdale & Sons Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  5. United States v. Green Acres Enterprises, Inc., W.R. Jenkins, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API