Legal Opinion
Keife v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided April 27, 2011No. 2:10-mj-00546PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Before the court is defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company’s (“MetLife”) motion to dismiss. Doc. #27. 1 Plaintiff Royal Bradford Keife (“Keife”) filed an opposition (Doc. #35) to which MetLife replied (Doc. # 39).
Also before the court are Keife’s motion to supplement his opposition, or in the alternative to stay the motion to dismiss (Doc. # 43) and MetLife’s motion for leave to file a sur-reply to Keife’s supplemental opposition (Doc. # 50).
1. Facts and Background
Non-party Betty May Keife had a $12,750 life insurance policy with defendant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Mendiondo v. Centinela Hospital Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Edmonson v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Otte v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Keife v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Garrison v. Jackson National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
- Brighter Path Alabama, LLC v. Rite of Passage, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.