Legal Opinion

United States v. Matthew Otis Charles

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 23, 2018No. 18-5318PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

Matthew Charles moved for and received a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2). The government appealed, and we reversed, instructing the district court to enter an order rejecting Charles' § 3582(c)(2) motion. The court did just that and reimposed Charles' original sentence. Because the district court did not err in following these directions, we affirm.

A jury convicted Charles on drug and weapons charges in 1996. He received a sentence of 35 years. After making several collateral attacks on his conviction and sentence, all fruitless, Charles moved…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. United States v. James E. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Matthew CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert WareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. Robinson v. MacLarenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  3. United States v. Andrew DavisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Robert WareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API