Legal Opinion

United States v. Matthew Charles

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 19, 2016No. 15-6074PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTTON, Circuit Judge.

Matthew Charles sought and obtained a reduced sentence under guidelines amendments 706 and 750, which lowered the recommended sentencing ranges for crack cocaine offenses. Charles acknowledges that, if the original sentencing court found him to be a career offender, these amendments would not decrease his guidelines range and thus would not permit a sentence reduction. Because a panel of this court previously held that Charles was a career offender on his direct appeal, we reverse.

Twenty years ago,'a jury found Charles guilty of several drug and firearm offenses,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. William Howe v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Matthew Otis CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Irene Dixon v. Ladish Company IncorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Randall Mills v. Weakley BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. Richard Clemons v. John CouchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Matthew Otis CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. First Mortgage Company v. DinaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  5. GS Holistic, LLC v. Wireless & Smoke LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API