United States v. Matthew Charles
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Matthew Charles sought and obtained a reduced sentence under guidelines amendments 706 and 750, which lowered the recommended sentencing ranges for crack cocaine offenses. Charles acknowledges that, if the original sentencing court found him to be a career offender, these amendments would not decrease his guidelines range and thus would not permit a sentence reduction. Because a panel of this court previously held that Charles was a career offender on his direct appeal, we reverse.
Twenty years ago,'a jury found Charles guilty of several drug and firearm offenses,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- William Howe v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Matthew Otis CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Irene Dixon v. Ladish Company IncorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
3Cited by91 opinions
- Randall Mills v. Weakley BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Richard Clemons v. John CouchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Matthew Otis CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- First Mortgage Company v. DinaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
- GS Holistic, LLC v. Wireless & Smoke LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.