Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Stern

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 8, 1960No. 38398PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beul, Judge.

The defendant, in urging his general demurrer, strenuously contends that the contract on which this action is brought and which was signed by both parties is too vague, indefinite, and uncertain to constitute an enforceable agreement. This assault is particularly directed against the financing provisions and certain of the specifications of the work to be performed in improving the property which were ty|ped into a printed contract form in the appropriate places provided. These typed specifications are as follows:

“(1) Remove exterior asbestos siding on present walls; (2) Renail…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tarbutton v. DugganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Jones v. ElyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  3. Lowery Lock Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  4. Wall v. J. W. Starr & Sons Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Wood v. Phoenix Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. Board of Commissioners of Roads & RevenuesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Walton v. DatryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Southern Airways Co. v. DeKalb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Peachtree Medical Building, Inc. v. KeelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  5. Indian Trail Village, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API