Schroeder v. Gateway Transportation Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
We believe a determination of two issues will resolve the appeal:
1. Is the action barred by the two-year statute of limitations (sec. 893.21 (5), Stats.) ?
2. Is the regulation “a covenant not to compete” and is it invalid under sec. 103.465, Stats. ?
The appellants, Gateway and the trustees, contend that the two-year statute of limitations applies. Sec. 893.21 (5), Stats., provides:
“893.21 Within 2 years. Within 2 years: . . .
“(5) Any action to recover unpaid salary, wages or other compensation for personal services, except fees for professional services.”
The respondent-executor argues, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Voigt v. South Side Laundry & Dry Cleaners, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Holsen v. Marshall & Ilsley BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Younger v. Rosenow Paper & Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Estate of JavornikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Union Central Life Insurance v. BalistrieriWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Zastrow v. Journal Communications, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Lorenz v. DreskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Nalco Chemical Company v. Hydro Technologies, Incorporated, Daniel H. Girmscheid and Thomas S. BrogeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Fields Foundation, Ltd. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Rosploch v. Alumatic Corp. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.