Legal Opinion

Kist v. Coughlin, Tr.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1936No. 26,463PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.

Appellee, Jane B. Coughlin, as trustee, began this action by filing a complaint, in the caption of which it appears that she, together with the Portland Republican Company and the Sun Publishing Company are plaintiffs, but in the body of which it clearly appears that those companies and all of the other parties to this appeal were defendants, and that she alone, as trustee, was plaintiff. Thereafter, upon leave of court, she filed an amended copiplaint with the same parties plaintiff and defendant, in which she alone, as trustee, appears in the caption as plaintiff. In the original complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Stair v. MeisselIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Continental Clay & Mining Co. v. BrysonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Levin v. Florsheim & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hay v. McDaneldIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wise v. CurdesIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kist v. CoughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Pry v. PryIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Kometscher v. WadeNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Johnson v. La Porte Bank & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API