Hay v. McDaneld
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Clark Circuit Court.
1Per curiam
Appellee’s motion to dismiss presents the question whether the appointment of the receiver was by interlocutory order or final decree. If by interlocutory order, the appeal must be dismissed because not taken within ten days from the appointment of the receiver.-
The complaint of appellee, as remainderman, charged appellant, as' life-tenant, with failure to pay taxes, assessments, etc., and asked the appointment of a receiver to take charge of the property and apply the rents to the payment of taxes, repairs, etc. The appointment of the receiver was not prayed for nor made pendente Ule.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Buchanan v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Guardian Savings Bank v. ReillyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880
- Hodges v. McDuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by4 opinions
- Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. Raike Ex Rel. MinnemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kist v. Coughlin, Tr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1936
- Ind. Nat. Bk. of Indianapolis v. Danner, Rec.Indiana Supreme Court · 1930
- Poston v. AkinIndiana Supreme Court · 1941