Legal Opinion
Waggoner v. R. McGray, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 26, 1977No. CV 76-3255-AAHPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law
HAUK, District Judge.
This case came to be heard before this court on May 2,1977, in courtroom 1, before the Honorable A. Andrew Hauk, Judge presiding, upon the motions of Defendants, Tri-Central Construction Company and O’Shaughnessy Construction Company, to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ complaint against said Defendants pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) F.R.Civ.P. The court, having read and studied the official court record in this action, including the complaint and the points and authorities filed by Plaintiffs and Defendants and having heard oral argument on said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Connell Construction Co. v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union No. 100Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Griffith Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Drivers, Salesmen, Warehousemen, Milk Processors, Cannery, Dairy Employees & Helpers, Local Union No. 695 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
3Cited by4 opinions
- Waggoner v. R. McGray, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Huge v. Long's Hauling Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Huge v. Long's Hauling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- William C. Waggoner, Etc. v. R. McGray Inc., O'ShaughneSSy Construction Company, Tri-Central Construction Company, and Vernon Houghton, C. William Burke, Etc. v. Ernest W. Hahn, Inc., Etc., Third-Party v. Peterson Brothers Equipment Co., Etc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979