Legal Opinion
Huge v. Long's Hauling Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 14, 1978No. 78-1060PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEITZ, Chief Judge, announcing the judgment of the court.
Defendant Long’s Hauling Company (Long) appeals from a preliminary injunction granted to the trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Health and Retirement Funds. See Huge v. Long's Hauling Co., 442 F.Supp. 1041 (W.D.Pa.1977). The trustees brought this suit under section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185, to enforce an alleged contractual obligation to make payments to the Health and Retirement Funds. Counterclaims filed by Long remain pending in the district court.
I
For several years prior to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Connell Construction Co. v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local Union No. 100Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Kelly v. KosugaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Lewis v. Benedict Coal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Huge v. Long's Hauling Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Martin v. Benesh & Bruns, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
- Foundation on Economic Trends v. HecklerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984