Legal Opinion

United States v. John Roger Sager, United States of America v. Jay Houston Harmon

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1984No. 82-1592, 82-1593PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

On May 22, 1984, after oral argument, we filed our opinion in these cases. United States v. Little, 735 F.2d 1049 (8th Cir.1984). 1 We reversed the convictions of defendants John Roger Sager and Jay Houston Harmon, holding that certain evidence introduced against them had been seized under a warrant based on an insufficient affidavit, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and that the case would have to be re-tried, as to these two defendants, without the tainted evidence. Our holding was of course based on the accepted principle, first announced…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. State v. NovembrinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Matthew Carlsen v. GameStop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Dracy Lamont McKneely Andrew Ellis, and Alandis Bennett, Also Known as Torjano AkinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Thomas James SavocaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. John LalorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API