Legal Opinion
Affiliated UTE Citizens of Utah v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 19, 1970No. 175-68PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an action wherein the plaintiff seeks to have conveyed to its individual members, “pro rata,” a portion of the oil, gas, and minerals underlying the Uintah and Ouray Reservation in Utah.
The plaintiff is an unincorporated association organized for and on behalf of some 490 mixed-bloods who were formerly or may be now members of the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation. The Congress- enacted Public Law No. 83-671 (25 U.S.C. §§ 677-677aa) which provides for the termination of the trust relationship with the mixed-blood members of this Ute Tribe and for the distribution to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Naganab v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Lee Motah and Horace Noyabad v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. PrestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Lena Harkins and Adam Harkins, for Themselves and for All Those Members of the Five Civilized Tribes Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
3Cited by11 opinions
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murdock v. Ute Indian Tribe of Uintah & Ouray ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Felter v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Murdock v. Ute Indian Tribe Of Uintah And Ouray ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Mary C. Vicenti, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.