Legal Opinion
Felter v. Salazar
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 15, 2010No. Civil Action 02-2156 (RWR)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Asserting that they are “mixed-blood” members of the Ute Band of Indians, the plaintiffs filed this action in 2002 against the Secretary 1 of the Department of the Interior (“DOI”), the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the DOI, the United States of America, and two employees of the Bureau of Indian Affairs for injuries suffered as a result of the defendants’ alleged wrongful termination under the Ute Partition and Termination Act (“UPA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 677 et seq., of plaintiffs’ status as federally recognized Indians. Defendants…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ward v. D.C. Department of Youth Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Lewis v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Bonaccorsy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Rosenblatt v. FentyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Carson v. SimDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.