Legal Opinion

Hillins v. Marketing Architects, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 6, 2011No. Civil File No. 10-2845 (MJD/LIB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER

MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 11]. The Court heard oral argument on July 29, 2011. For the rea*1147sons that follow, the Court denies the motion for summary judgment.

II. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

1. The Parties

Defendant Marketing Architects, Inc. (“MAI”) is a Minnesota company that assists radio and television advertisers in their direct-marketing advertising initiatives.

Plaintiff Sara Hillins has a BA in marketing and an MBA. She was hired by MAI in October 2005 as…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. DAVID GRIFFITH, PLAINTIFF—APPELLANT v. CITY OF DES MOINES, DEFENDANTS—APPELLEESCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  4. Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Samuel Stallings v. Hussmann Corporation Brian GroningerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hanson v. Mental Health Resources, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  2. Brown v. Amesbury ManagementDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2025
  3. Racz v. Mayo ClinicDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API