Hoene v. City of Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.
The appellants contend that the damage to their real estate abutting West Blue Mound road was caused by the city’s failure to construct and repair that street in a, manner sufficient to withstand heavy traffic. They argue that the city is liable to them for damages under sec. 81.15, Stats. The city contends that the statute imposes on it a duty *212only with respect to travelers on the street and does not impose any duty on the city with respect to adjoining landowners.
Sec. 81.15, Stats., provides in part that:
“If damages happen to any person or his property by reason of the insufficiency or want…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Harper v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Schiro v. Oriental Realty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Columbia CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Prah v. MarettiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Luber v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Krueger v. MitchellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Laska v. SteinpreisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Bubolz v. Dane CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.