Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Franson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 2018No. A18-0539Published

1Dissent

RANDALL, Judge (dissenting)

I respectfully dissent.

The facts and reasoning in this case are similar to this court's prior unpublished decisions in State v. Jones , No. A17-0632, 2018 WL 1145861 (Minn. App. Mar. 5, 2018), and State v. Carlson , No. A18-0144, 2018 WL 4391101 (Minn. App. Sept. 17, 2018). These decisions are not precedential. Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2016). But I find their reasoning persuasive, logical, and a fit on the facts and I would follow them. See State v. Roy , 761 N.W.2d 883, 888 (Minn. App. 2009) (acknowledging that prior unpublished opinion was not precedential,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Ge HerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Martinek v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. State v. MegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. State v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API