State v. Meger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MCKEIG, Justice.
In State v. Her, 862 N.W.2d 692, 696-700 (Minn. 2015), we held that the fact that a defendant was a risk-level-III offender at the time of the offense must be admitted by the defendant or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt before a court may impose a 10-year period of conditional release as part of a sentence for failing to register as a predatory offender. The issue here is whether Her applies retroactively to sentences that were imposed and became final before Her was decided. In a motion to correct his sentence under Minn. R. Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. FransonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- Adrian Dominic Riley v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
- Carlos Heard v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Carlos Heard, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
- Fidel Pizarro-Rios v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.