Legal Opinion

State v. Meger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 20, 2017No. A15-1823PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MCKEIG, Justice.

In State v. Her, 862 N.W.2d 692, 696-700 (Minn. 2015), we held that the fact that a defendant was a risk-level-III offender at the time of the offense must be admitted by the defendant or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt before a court may impose a 10-year period of conditional release as part of a sentence for failing to register as a predatory offender. The issue here is whether Her applies retroactively to sentences that were imposed and became final before Her was decided. In a motion to correct his sentence under Minn. R. Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. FransonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  2. Adrian Dominic Riley v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
  3. Carlos Heard v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. Carlos Heard, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
  5. Fidel Pizarro-Rios v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API