Legal Opinion

Baker v. Temple

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1910No. Docket No. 140PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Sessions, J. Assumpsit by John D. Baker against Ansel F. Temple for breach of a contract for the sale of a boat. Judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Defendant was owner of a steamer known as the “Rudolph.” While she lay sunk at a dock in Muskegon, plaintiff made an agreement of purchase for $800. He paid $25 down, and was to pay the remainder at a later date. The parties disagree about the time for the payment; defendant claiming that he was to pay within four weeks, plaintiff that it was to be after his return from a trip to Georgian Bay. Some six weeks later one' Moiles purchased the boat from defendant for $800. On learning this, plaintiff tendered defendant the remainder of the price agreed upon by them. Defendant offered to show…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Mott v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Maxson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Rauch v. Michigan Millers' Mutual Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Long-Bell Lumber Co. v. NymanMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rousseau v. Brotherhood of American YeomenMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Good v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Paul v. ClementsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API