Paul v. Clements
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Minnie Ham Paul presented for probate the will of Helen E. Sossoman, and on appeal to the circuit court a judgment was entered admitting the instrument to probate. Contestant Emma Clements brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.
Emma Clements, the contestant and: appellant herein, is a sister of Helen E. Sossoman, deceased, whose will was admitted to probate in the probate court of Muskegon county on April 9, 1912.
At the time of her death, testatrix was a resident of Whitehall, in said county. The will in controversy was executed by her on June 5, 1906, at the city of Mishawaka, Ind., where she was then residing and had made her home for many years, having previously moved there from Whitehall, to which place she returned, and there resumed her residence not long before her death. At the time she executed this will…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beaubien v. CicotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- Prentis v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- O'Connor v. MadisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Lamb v. LippincottMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Cooper v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. ZabijakMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Noon v. MurrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. HannumMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re Lembrich's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- In Re Myrtle DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.