Legal Opinion
Spengler v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 19, 2016No. 15-794CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Keywords: Pro Se Plaintiff; Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; RCFC 12(b)(1); Trusts; 31 U.S.C. § 1321; Transfer; 29 U.S.C. § 1631.
OPINION AND ORDER
ELAINE D. KAPLAN, Judge.
This case is currently before the Court on the government’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). For the reasons set forth below, the government’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
BACKGROUND
The pro se plaintiff in this case, Andrew R. Spengler, is currently…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Spengler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Pontefract v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Pontefract v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023