Legal Opinion
Spengler v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 26, 2016No. 15-794CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Keywords: RCFC 59; RCFC 60; Motion for Reconsideration; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Fiduciary Duty; Prison Mailbox Rule; Commissary and Welfare Fund
OPINION AND ORDER
KAPLAN Judge
This case is currently before the Court on Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration pursuant to Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) 59 and 60(b). The pro se plaintiff, Andrew Spengler, seeks reconsideration of this Court’s July 19, 2016 Opinion and Order granting the government’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). See Spengler v. United States, 127 Fed.Cl. 597…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Innotek, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Sigmatech, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019