Legal Opinion
Pontefract v. United States
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 21, 2023No. 4:22-cv-01683Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CLYDE PONTEFRACT, ) CASE NO. 4:22-CV-01683 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE CHARLES E. FLEMING ) vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND Defendants. ) ORDER Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss made under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant United States of America. (ECF No. 9). Pro se Plaintiff, Clyde Pontefract, opposed the United States’ Motion (ECF No. 11), and the United States filed a Reply (ECF No. 12). Pontefract also filed a Sur-Reply (ECF No. 13), but it was filed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Robert W. Ritchie, Personally and in His Capacity as a Partner/officer of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.