Legal Opinion

Barrios-Lomeli v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1997No. 27484PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Young, J.:

In Barrios-Lomeli v. State, 113 Nev. 952, 944 P.2d 791 (1997), this court reversed a conviction because the police violated appellant Ruben Barrios-Lomeli’s rights by searching his parked, unoc*780cupied vehicle without a warrant. The state filed a petition for rehearing. NRAP 40(c). We deny rehearing. See State v. Harnisch, 114 Nev. 225, 954 P.2d 1180 (1998).

However, we take this opportunity to address the state’s contention that the one-hour limit in NRS 171.123(4)1 is an inadequate amount of time to obtain a search warrant. After careful consideration, we reject…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Randono v. Cuna Mutual Insurance GroupNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. HarnischNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Union Plaza Hotel v. JacksonNevada Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Laurie Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. State v. McKellipsNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  3. v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  4. Hiibel v. SIXTH DIST. CT. EX REL. HUMBOLDTNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Camacho v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API