Legal Opinion
Camacho v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 2003No. 39765Published
1Opinion of the Court
75 P.3d 370 (2003)
Ruben CAMACHO, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.
No. 39765.
Supreme Court of Nevada.
August 29, 2003.
Rehearing Denied October 23, 2003.
Dennis A. Cameron, Reno, for Appellant.
Brian Sandoval, Attorney General, Carson City; Richard A. Gammick, District Attorney, and Gary H. Hatlestad, Deputy District Attorney, Washoe County, for Respondent.
Before ROSE, MAUPIN and GIBBONS, JJ.
OPINION
ROSE, J.
This is an appeal from a district court's judgment of conviction and sentence following appellant Ruben Camacho's guilty plea.[1] Camacho argues on appeal that the district court…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.