State v. Garcia
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Justice.
[¶ 1J Pablo Garcia appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to re-open and vacate judgment. In applying the principles set forth in Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989), the trial court determined that the rule announced in the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010) was a new rule that does not apply retroactively. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[¶ 2.] Garcia was born in Mexico. Pri- or to his first birthday, Garcia’s mother moved with Garcia to the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Implicated IndividualSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Garcia v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Siers v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. BishopOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Lucero v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015