Legal Opinion

Lucero v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 9, 2015No. Appellate Case No. 2012-213130; No. 5352Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI.

KONDUROS, J.

In this post-conviction relief (PCR) action, the State argues the PCR court erred in finding Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), applied retroactively and granting Ken Lucero’s application for PCR. The State also contends the PCR court erred in denying its motion to dismiss on the basis that the application was barred by the statute of limitations and laches. We reverse.

*242FACTS

Lucero was born in Ecuador, moved to the United States in 1993, and became a “permanent resident alien” in 2000. On June 6, 2002, she was traveling…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API