Legal Opinion

Compton v. Hammond Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment entered in the circuit court of Multnomah county in favor of plaintiff, based on the verdict of a jury, in the sum of $l,200-^-$700 as damages and $500 on the maintenance cause. This'appeal questions the propriety of the court’s rulings permitting the judgment.

The case is stated about as follows: The Hammond Lumber Company is the owner of a steamship named the Covena. On June 10, 1933, the vessel was taking on a part cargo of lumber in the Portland harbor, and plaintiff joined the vessel as second mate for coast-wise. The vessel proceeded to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Pacific Steamship Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Dushane v. BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Butler v. State Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. McCall v. Inter Harbor Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Compton v. Hammond Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API