Legal Opinion

Forman v. Hancock

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1934No. Civ. 5251PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The grantor and grantees named in deeds to certain Los Angeles lots have appealed from a judgment which was rendered in a suit for declaratory relief brought under the provisions of section 1060 of the Code of. Civil Procedure to construe a clause in those instruments which restricts the use of the lots, among other limitations, to residential purposes. The deeds provide for a forfeiture of title and the right of repossession by the grantor in the event of a violation of any of these prohibited uses of the land. The court found that the conditions surrounding the premises changed since the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hurd v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Hess v. Country Club ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Downs v. KroegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Strong v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Div. of Labor Law Enf't v. Transpacific Transp. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Decter v. Stevenson Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Culjak v. Better Built Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Williams v. McDowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Alexander v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API