Forman v. Hancock
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The grantor and grantees named in deeds to certain Los Angeles lots have appealed from a judgment which was rendered in a suit for declaratory relief brought under the provisions of section 1060 of the Code of. Civil Procedure to construe a clause in those instruments which restricts the use of the lots, among other limitations, to residential purposes. The deeds provide for a forfeiture of title and the right of repossession by the grantor in the event of a violation of any of these prohibited uses of the land. The court found that the conditions surrounding the premises changed since the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hurd v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hess v. Country Club ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Downs v. KroegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Strong v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Div. of Labor Law Enf't v. Transpacific Transp. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Decter v. Stevenson Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Culjak v. Better Built Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Williams v. McDowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Alexander v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.