Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lindemann Properties, Ltd. v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 22, 2017No. 02-15-00392-CVPublished

1Dissent

.SUE WALKER, JUSTICE,

dissenting.

I. Introduction

By its express terms, the easement at issue here (the Easement), authorized the installation of a single radio-transmission tower and terminated if “said radio transmission tower” was “abandoned and/or removed.” Because the Easement here is susceptible to only one reasonable interpretation after applying established rules of contract construction, and because the pertinent facts—that a second,, bigger, taller, and wider radio transmission tower was installed on the dominant estate in a new location and the original “said radio transmission tower”…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. DeWitt County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API