Legal Opinion
Mullins v. United States Department of Energy
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 13, 1995No. 93-1424PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge PLAGER. Dissenting opinion filed by Chief Judge ARCHER.
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, owners of Texaco service stations, sought a declaratory judgment that the Department of Energy (“Agency”) erred in its implementation of special refund procedures for the disbursement of some $1.2 billion that the Agency secured from Texaco, Inc. in settlement of certain Agency enforcement actions. The District Court for the Western District of Kentucky declined to disturb the Agency action, and granted the Agency’s motion for summary judgment. Mullins v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Guy Spezzaferro v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Boyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Rudolph S. Gonzales v. Defense Logistics AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Mullins v. United States Dept. of EnergyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- NEC Corp. v. U.S. Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Consolidated Edison Company Of New York, Inc. v. Hazel O'learyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. O'LearyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Robert C. Mullins v. United States Department Of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995