Legal Opinion

Consolidated Edison Co. v. O'Leary

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 12, 1997No. 97-1242PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

This ease calls on us to decide whether interested private parties may obtain judicial review of a decision by the Department of Energy not to bring enforcement proceedings against another private party. Acting through its Office of Hearings and Appeals, the Department of Energy refused the request of the Economic Regulatory Administration, another component of the Department of Energy, to issue a remedial order against defendant-appellee Chevron U.S.A. Inc. The remedial order would have required Chevron to make restitutionary payments for *1477violations of regulations…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Atlantic Richfield Company v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. Pepsico, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Corvallis, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. Bulzan v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Consolidated Edison Company Of New York, Inc. v. Hazel O'learyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API