Mathis v. Swanson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.
This action, predicated upon the attractive nuisance doctrine, was commenced by Ethel Mathis, as guardian ad litem for her son, Daniel Mathis, aged 13, who was injured while on the property of the defendants, when his brother, walking on a steel I beam, caused it to fail on Daniel’s foot. The defendants were the owners of Swanson’s Market in Aberdeen and the owners of the Lamb Construction Company, which was in charge of remodeling the market.
The defendants were granted summary judgment of dismissal, and plaintiff appeals.
The facts, as shown by the pleadings, affidavits, depositions, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schock v. Ringling Bros. Etc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Lundgren v. KierenWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Holland v. NiemiWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Slemmons v. ShotwellWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Peterson v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ochampaugh v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Gabel v. KobaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- Ochampaugh v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979