Legal Opinion

Hutchison v. Wells

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided September 14, 1989No. IP 86-891-CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY

BARKER, District Judge.

The present controversy involves a petition for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, following a judgment for the plaintiff pursuant to a Rule 68 offer of judgment. The defendants object to the petition on a number of grounds. Specifically, they contest:

1) the inclusion of hours spent on a count that was dismissed;

2) the inclusion of hours spent subsequent to the initial offer of judgment;

3) the lack of contemporaneous billing records;

4) the total number of hours billed;

5) the billing rate; and

6) the appended claims of attorneys peripherally related to the case.

T…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Good Timez, Inc. v. Phoenix Fire and Marine Ins. Co.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1991
  2. Lang v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Denny v. HintonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1990
  4. Lang v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Dickinson v. Indiana State Election BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API