Hutchison v. Wells
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
BARKER, District Judge.
The present controversy involves a petition for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, following a judgment for the plaintiff pursuant to a Rule 68 offer of judgment. The defendants object to the petition on a number of grounds. Specifically, they contest:
1) the inclusion of hours spent on a count that was dismissed;
2) the inclusion of hours spent subsequent to the initial offer of judgment;
3) the lack of contemporaneous billing records;
4) the total number of hours billed;
5) the billing rate; and
6) the appended claims of attorneys peripherally related to the case.
T…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Good Timez, Inc. v. Phoenix Fire and Marine Ins. Co.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1991
- Lang v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Denny v. HintonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1990
- Lang v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Dickinson v. Indiana State Election BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.