Legal Opinion · Dissent

'O Haleakalâ v. Board of Land & Natural Resources

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 2016No. SCWC-13-0003065Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

POLLACK, J.,

IN WHICH WILSON, J., JOINS AS TO PARTS IA AND II

When an administrative agency acting in a quasi-judicial capacity makes or receives (1) substantive ex parte communications, (2) procedural ex parte communications that have the potential to influence the agency adjudicator, or (3) ex parte contacts with interested persons or parties in the case, due process under the Hawai'i Constitution requires disclosure of the communications. Due process also prohibits the insertion of external political pressure into a quasi-judicial administrative proceeding. The state of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Professional Baseball, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  5. Sierra Club v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, National Coal Association, Alabama Power Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API