Houghton v. Woodley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
The question on appeal is whether the trial court erred in entering a declaratory judgment in the plaintiffs’ favor as to their right to use a twenty-foot strip of land as a drive and in permanently enjoining defendants from interfering with plaintiffs’ use of such drive. We find no error and affirm.
In order to determine the respective rights of the parties and resolve this appeal, we must review the law concerning dedication of a street or highway. Dedication is defined as follows:
[A] [dedication is the intentional appropriation of land by the owner to some proper public…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Nicholas v. Salisbury Hardware and Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Spaugh v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Hine v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Green v. BarbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pleak v. Entrada Property Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Price v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Pleak v. EntradaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003