Legal Opinion
Blair v. City of Hannibal
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided July 12, 2016No. Case No. 2:15CV00061 ERWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
E. RICHARD WEBBER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant City of Hannibal’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [ECF No. 41].
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
Plaintiffs Jacob and Sarah Blair (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Class Action Complaint in this Court on August 25, 2015, against Defendants City of Hannibal (“Hannibal”), Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc. (“Redflex”) and Does 1 through 24 alleging Hannibal’s red light camera program is unconstitutional. [ECF No. 1], On November 16, 2015, Plaintiffs filed an Amended Class Action…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Ashley County, Ark. v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thompson v. City of St. PetersDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016