Legal Opinion
State v. AU Optronics Corp.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 5, 2014No. 69318-2-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.
¶1 In this case we consider the due process limitations on a Washington court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction over two foreign corporations, LG Display Co. Ltd. and LG Display America Inc. (collectively LG Display). LG Display manufactures and distributes components for retail consumer goods that third parties mass-market throughout the United States. It does not manufacture or distribute any component within the state of Washington.
¶2 After LG Display admitted participating in a worldwide conspiracy to fix the prices of LCD (liquid crystal display) panels, the State sued it in King…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. LG Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. LG Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Air Serv Corporation & Abm Aviation, Inc. v. John E. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Noll v. American Biltrite, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Donald Noll And Candance Noll v. Special Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.