Noll v. American Biltrite, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
¶1 A Washington court may exercise specific personal jurisdiction over the nonresident supplier of raw asbestos used as a component of asbestos-cement pipe when the pipe, manufactured in California, enters the stream of commerce and is sold on a regular basis to buyers in Washington. The defendant supplier in this case did not *576specifically target Washington as a destination for its product and may not have actually known that its asbestos was ending up in Washington as a component of pipe. Nevertheless, the regular course of sales that brought the pipe into Washington satisfies the due…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Noll v. Am. Biltrite, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- Noll v. Amer. Biltrite Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2017