Legal Opinion

Noll v. American Biltrite, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 29, 2015No. 71345-1-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 A Washington court may exercise specific personal jurisdiction over the nonresident supplier of raw asbestos used as a component of asbestos-cement pipe when the pipe, manufactured in California, enters the stream of commerce and is sold on a regular basis to buyers in Washington. The defendant supplier in this case did not *576specifically target Washington as a destination for its product and may not have actually known that its asbestos was ending up in Washington as a component of pipe. Nevertheless, the regular course of sales that brought the pipe into Washington satisfies the due…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Noll v. Am. Biltrite, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Noll v. Amer. Biltrite Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API