State v. LG Electronics, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — In resolving this appeal, which requires us to consider the due process limitations on the exercise of personal jurisdiction over certain foreign corporations, we hold that because a product manufactured by these foreign corporations was sold — as an integrated component part of retail consumer goods — into Washington in high volume over a period of years, the corporations “purposefully” established “minimum contacts” in Washington. Owing to our conclusion that the Attorney General alleged sufficient “minimum contacts” to support an exercise of specific jurisdiction by Washington courts,…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LG Electronics, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
- Air Serv Corporation & Abm Aviation, Inc. v. John E. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Noll v. American Biltrite, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. LG Elecs., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
- Brindley v. Geico Advantage Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.