Legal Opinion

Hiser v. Hulsey

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 2, 1990No. 88-1365PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HORNSBY, Chief Justice.

This is a landline dispute. The Hisers appeal from a judgment of the trial court that determined the correct coterminous boundary of the parties to be that boundary shown by the Hulseys’ surveyor, Jack Loden. The plaintiffs, Joel and Maridane Hiser, had lived in California since 1974. In 1985, they purchased the N ½ of the SE ⅝ of Section 23, Township 10 South, Range 11 West in Marion County, Alabama. The Hulseys own the S lh of the NE ¼ of Section 23. Thus, the Hisers purchased the property south of the Hul-seys. The location of the government survey line separating…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. GarrardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Hayes v. CotterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Moore v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Ryan v. FulfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shoemaker v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API