Legal Opinion
Shoemaker v. Allen
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 24, 1992No. 1901925PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
This is a landline dispute. The defendants, John and Nancy Shoemaker, appeal from a judgment of the trial court determining the correct coterminous boundary of the parties to be that boundary shown by the plaintiffs’ surveyor.
The Shoemakers purchased a piece of land in 1973 described in the deed as:
“AH land owned by Grantors lying East of the road in the NE ¼ of SW ¼ and the NW ¼ of the SE lk, less 2¾⅛ acres owned by Oscar Taylor and a tract of land described as: Beginning at a point 66 feet South of SW corner of NE ¼ of SW ¼, Section 31, Township 13 North, Range 2 West and run East parallel…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hiser v. HulseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moody v. WakefieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997