Rogers v. Mullins
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CONNER, Chief Justice.
This suit is a suit for damages for malicious prosecution, instituted by appellee against appellants October 23, 1900, based upon complaint sworn to by appellant Rogers alone, and .filed with a committing magistrate of Shackelford County, September 4, 1900, charging appellee and another with theft of cattle. It was alleged that warrant had been issued and appellee arrested by virtue thereof; that appellee had given bail for his appearance before said magistrate on September 10th, upon which day the magistrate discharged appellee, and “said false and malicious prosecution…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sebastian v. CheneyTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Schippel v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Glasgow v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Dreyfus v. AulNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Moyle v. DrakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sullivan v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Suhre v. KottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Stein v. GreenebaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Rust v. PageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Zello v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.