Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Mullins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 1, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

This suit is a suit for damages for malicious prosecution, instituted by appellee against appellants October 23, 1900, based upon complaint sworn to by appellant Rogers alone, and .filed with a committing magistrate of Shackelford County, September 4, 1900, charging appellee and another with theft of cattle. It was alleged that warrant had been issued and appellee arrested by virtue thereof; that appellee had given bail for his appearance before said magistrate on September 10th, upon which day the magistrate discharged appellee, and “said false and malicious prosecution…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sebastian v. CheneyTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Schippel v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. Glasgow v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Dreyfus v. AulNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Moyle v. DrakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Suhre v. KottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Stein v. GreenebaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Rust v. PageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Zello v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API