Suhre v. Kott
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtPly, C. J.
This is an action for damages arising from a malicious prosecution in initiating lunacy proceedings against appellant. It was alleged that without probable cause therefor appellees maliciously and falsely made an affidavit that appellant was a lunatic, or non compos mentis; that it was necessary that he should be placed under restraint; that they procured his arrest and had him brought before a justice of the peace, who refused him bond and placed him in jail; that he was taken before a commission and tided for lunacy and was discharged; that appellees have continued to pursue appellant and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gold v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Griffin v. ChubbTexas Supreme Court · 1852
- McLeod v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Hagadorn v. . RauxNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Breneman v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- American Automobile Ins. Co. v. ConeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Pate v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Euresti v. Valdez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Dahl v. AkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Peerless Oil & Gas Co. v. TeasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.