Legal Opinion

Suhre v. Kott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 7, 1917No. 5813PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPly, C. J.

This is an action for damages arising from a malicious prosecution in initiating lunacy proceedings against appellant. It was alleged that without probable cause therefor appellees maliciously and falsely made an affidavit that appellant was a lunatic, or non compos mentis; that it was necessary that he should be placed under restraint; that they procured his arrest and had him brought before a justice of the peace, who refused him bond and placed him in jail; that he was taken before a commission and tided for lunacy and was discharged; that appellees have continued to pursue appellant and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gold v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. Griffin v. ChubbTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  3. McLeod v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hagadorn v. . RauxNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Breneman v. WestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. American Automobile Ins. Co. v. ConeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Pate v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Euresti v. Valdez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  4. Dahl v. AkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Peerless Oil & Gas Co. v. TeasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API