Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Mucklow

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 26, 2000No. 00PDJ010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS

SANCTION IMPOSED: PUBLIC CENSURE

This matter was heard on July 18, 2000 before the Presiding Disciplinary Judge ("PDJ") and two Hearing Board members, Richard P. Holme, and Henry C. Frey. Charles E. Mortimer, Jr., assistant Attorney Regulation Counsel, represented the People of the State of Colorado (the "People"). David R. Brougham represented respondent. The People's exhibits 1 through 7 and respondent's exhibits A, C and D were admitted into evidence by stipulation. The PDJ and Hearing Board heard testimony from the People's witnesses George R. Buck, Ir.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. PautlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. People v. MucklowSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. People v. PautlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. State v. WadeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  5. State v. WadeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API