Legal Opinion
People v. Pautler
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 2, 2001No. 00PDJ016PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS
SANCTION IMPOSED: ATTORNEY SUSPENDED FOR THREE MONTHS, PERIOD OF SUSPENSION STAYED DURING A PROBATIONARY PERIOD OF TWELVE MONTHS
The Complaint in this disciplinary action was filed February 24, 2000. The respondent, Mark C. Pautler, ("Pautler"), filed an Answer on March 28, 2000. On June 9, 2000, the People of the State of Colorado (the "People") filed a Motion for Summary Judgment with supporting documentation pursuant to C.R.C.P. 56. Pautler timely filed a Response to the motion with supporting doe-umentation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge ("PDJ")…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Eid Hammad, A/K/A Eddie Hammad, and Taiseer HammadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- People v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. RameySupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Domingo-Gomez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- In Re HagerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re PeasleyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- v. SniderColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- Petitioner: Victor Hugo DOMINGO-GOMEZ v. Respondent: The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.