Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Wade

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 28, 2003No. 01-318Published

1Concurrence

Johnson, J.,

¶ 12. concurring. I agree with the Court that we must reinstate Wade’s conviction because the prosecutor’s discovery violation did not actually prejudice his defense. The majority opinion is incomplete, however, because it offers no remedy for the pattern of discovery abuse and neglect established by the facts the trial court found. This Court is obliged to refer the prosecutor’s conduct to our Professional Responsibility Program for investigation and appropriate action given the facts the trial court found below. Thus, I concur with the Court’s judgment to reverse Wade’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. Starusko, JohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. State v. BadgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. People v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API