Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Cheboygan Slack-Water Navigation Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Cheboygan. Trespass on the case. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This is a suit to recover of the defendant a considerable sum of money which the plaintiffs have paid under protest, as tolls for passing through a canal around a "dam constructed by defendant across the Cheboygan river about a mile above its mouth where, before the construction of any dam, there were rapids. To an understanding of the legal questions it is necessary to have some knowledge of the water-courses which find an outlet by way of this river.

The stream named the Cheboygan is eight miles long, passing from Mullett lake to Mackinaw straits. Mullett lake is twelve miles long by three…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ames v. Port Huron Log Driving & Booming Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Benjamin v. Manistee River Improvement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Attorney General ex rel. Nelson v. McArthurMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Salliotte v. King Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  2. Osborne v. Knife Falls Boom Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Valentine ex rel. Dudley v. Berrien Springs Water-Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Underwood Lumber Co. v. Pelican Boom Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Indiana Port Commission v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API