Comtec, Inc. v. Municipality of Anchorage
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
INTRODUCTION
In November, 1983, Comtec, Inc., filed a complaint against the Anchorage Telephone Utility alleging that its lease, rental, and sale of customer telephone equipment was an unlawful use of public funds in violation of article IX, § 6 of the Alaska Constitution. Following cross motions for summary judgment, Judge Johnstone granted summary judgment in favor of Anchorage Telephone. For the purposes of summary judgment, the parties agreed that there were no genuine issues of material fact. We affirm Judge Johnstone’s decision.
THE FACTS
The Municipality of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- DeArmond v. Alaska State Development CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Suber v. Alaska State Bond CommitteeAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Walker v. Alaska State Mortgage AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Lien v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Weber v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1999